Lightning Talks
Tuesday, April 14, 2026 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM
LIGHTNING TALKS
If you are a registered delegate, please login to view the full session information and resources
Peer coaching circles (PCCs) for Personal Academic Tutors (PATs): Celebrating success through peer collaboration and building a new community of practice.
Supporting PATs through providing opportunities for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) can influence more positive academic and wellbeing outcomes for students (Gammage et al, 2021; Gannon, 2025). Coaching encourages PATs to engage in reflective practice, leading to transformative learning and improvement (Jones & Smith, 2022). Training PATs to use structured coaching frameworks can build transferable skills for application in diverse contexts. Coaching is commonly used as an evidence informed approach with students; however this lightning talk describes a different scenario, explaining how a series PCCs were established with a group of PATs at UCL (led by UCL Arena) to enhance their confidence and skills in their role, through engaging in structured and reflective dialogue with peers. Coaching approaches in Higher Education have been shown to foster improved confidence in participants. (Seraj & Leggett, 2023).Small cohorts of PATs work with a qualified coach across five one hour online sessions. Session 1 sets expectations, roles and facilitates group agreements; Sessions 2–5 are structured peer coaching conversations in which participants take turns to bring a current tutoring challenge for exploration. Each meeting offers protected time to pause, think and learn in a purposeful, coaching style dialogue, enabling participants to test ideas, refine practice and celebrate success. Participants offer each other feedback and share best practice tips. Eligibility requires current PAT status and experience, alongside commitment to attend all sessions and actively contribute.
Grounded in coaching theory (e.g. Whitmore, 2017), PCCs treat coaching as a non judgemental, goal focused partnership that builds strengths, reflection and self efficacy. PATs use GROW (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) to clarify aims, explore pathways and commit to actionable steps, while adopting questioning over giving directive advice. Drawing on collaborative learning theory and Vygotsky’s ‘zone of proximal development’ (1978), PCCs create a social space where fellow PATs co construct understanding within a safe psychological climate, extending learning, scaffolding through supported challenge.
We outline practical techniques used in PCCs; e.g, contracting, active listening and open ended questioning, reframing, and action planning and explore how these practices built confidence, clarity and self awareness for participants. Evaluation from pilot cohorts highlighted key strengths: (1) the formation of a Community of Practice (COP) that sustains mutual support and sharing of effective strategies; (2) a regular structured ‘stop point’ for constructive reflection; (3) small group intimacy that enables confidentiality, psychological safety and honest discussion of complex cases. Suggestions that enhanced effectiveness included fortnightly sessions to maintain momentum, sharing one sentence challenges in advance, an optional in person launch to build trust, and extending the final session for richer collective evaluation.
Crucially, PCCs develop transferable coaching capabilities that PATs can apply directly with tutees. By modelling collaborative, scaffolded inquiry, PCCs also equip tutors to foster student agency, engagement and wellbeing, while strengthening advising consistency across programmes. Participants report greater reflective capacity, improved confidence handling sensitive issues, and deeper appreciation of peer dialogue as ongoing CPD. This talk showcases the PCC process, evaluation insights and invites UKAT colleagues to discuss opportunities for replication; celebrating success through peer collaboration and building sustainable COPs.
Learning Outcomes
2 Participants will learn how to use peer collaboration to support their personal development as reflective practitioners and apply new learning to enhance future interactions with students.
Bibliography
Gannon, L. (2025). Using the 3 ‘C’s to Unlock Student Success: A Closer Look at a Coaching Approach to Personal Tutoring. Waypoint-A Reflective Journal of Student Advising and Development in Tertiary Education, 1(1), 53-62. 5.
Jones, T. and Smith, L. (2022) ‘Support at a distance: Rethinking student services in the post-pandemic HE landscapes’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 70(4), pp. 489–506.
Seraj, S., and Leggett, R. (2023). The challenges of personal tutoring in higher education: Applying a coaching approach at a UK higher education institution. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 21(1), 85-98.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.
Whitmore, J. (2017). Coaching for performance: The principles and practice of coaching and leadership (5th ed.). Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Competencies
This session addresses the following competencies of the UKAT Professional Framework for Advising and TutoringC3 - Academic advising and tutoring approaches and strategies
P3 - Commit to students, colleagues, and their institutions through engagement in continuing professional development, scholarly enquiry, and the evaluation of professional practices
P4 - Understand the implications of quality assurance and quality enhancement, and engage in on-going evaluation and development of advising and tutoring practice
Mediating cross-cultural challenges through Personal Academic Tutoring in UK HE: A mixed-method study of international students & faculty
The internationalisation of UK higher education has created a diverse environment in which international faculty and students must navigate cross-cultural sensitivity challenges of unfamiliar communication styles, feedback practices, and academic expectations (Ryan, 2012). These cross-cultural differences often lead to misunderstanding, reduced confidence, and barriers to student engagement and academic success (Leask, 2015). These premises heighten the question of how HE institutions' faculty can effectively advise in times of rapid change. Conversely, Personal Academic Tutoring (PAT) practice potentially offers a relational space where students can interpret academic norms, articulate concerns, and build a sense of belonging, thereby supporting engagement and academic success. Current literature shows mixed findings on cross-cultural sensitivity and integration challenges of international students and faculty, but cannot support current times' reality in the UK HE (Brown & Holloway, 2008; McDonald, 2014; Lochtie et al., 2018; Spencer-Oatey & Dauber, 2019; Deuchar, 2022; Wang et al., 2025). Hence, necessitating a systematic, rigorous research to examine how PAT mediates these challenges. Therefore, the present study examined how PAT mediates cross-cultural challenges between international students and faculty in UK higher education and leveraged to support inclusive advising in a time of rapid change. The following research questions will guide the study.1. What cross-cultural communication and academic adjustment challenges and adjustments do international students and faculty experience in UK HE?
2. What is the impact of these cross-cultural challenges on international students' confidence, academic integration, and sense of belonging?
3. How do international students and faculty describe the role of PAT as a relational space for mediating cross-cultural difference, academic integration, and fostering belonging?
This study employed a mixed-methods research design within an interpretivist paradigm, utilising a phenomenological approach to examine the lived experiences of both groups (Creswell & Poth, 2018). It combined survey data from over 100 international students and faculty with two focus group interviews in London. The survey component specifically addresses the quantitative understanding to answer RQ 1, 2, and 3. At the same time, the focus group interviews provided qualitative insights to explain/triangulate the PAT mediating effect in international student and faculty cross-cultural sensitivity building. These combined methods allow for in-depth investigation of how PAT influences cross-cultural sensitivity, supports academic integration, and fosters relationship-building. Thereby, producing a valid, reliable analysis to improve future policy and practice (Sammons & Davis, 2017; Zhou et al., 2024).
Findings: The study findings highlighted the key but understudied role of PATs in international faculty and student relationship-building. It reveals that PATs can influence student integration by acting as informal mentors, utilising responsive strategies such as active listening, empathy, and awareness of backgrounds to guide students. The study concluded that PAT practice goes beyond academic support to foster intercultural competence, aiding institutions in developing inclusive cultural sensitivity practices. Its novelty lies in supporting UKAT's aim to use PAT as a strategic tool for bridging cultural gaps and promoting equity in diverse UK higher education, enhancing student engagement.
Learning Outcomes
2. Delegates will be able to reflect on their advising practices to reduce cultural dissonance and apply inclusive PAT strategies to strengthen belonging and equitable student outcomes.
Bibliography
Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C. N., (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Deuchar, A. (2022) ‘The problem with international students’ “experiences” and the promise of their practices: Reanimating research about international students in higher education’, British educational research journal, 48(3), pp. 504–518. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3779.
Leask, B. (2015) Internationalising the Curriculum. London: Routledge.
Lochtie, D. et al. (2018) Effective Personal Tutoring in Higher Education. Critical Publishing.
McDonald, I. (2014) ‘Supporting international students in UK higher education institutions’, Perspectives (Association of University Administrators (Great Britain) : Online), 18(2), pp. 62–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2014.909900.
Ryan, J. & Carroll, J. (eds.), (2020) Teaching International Students: Improving Learning for All. London: Routledge.
Sammons, P. & Davis, S. (2017) ‘Mixed Methods Approaches and their Application in Educational Research’, in N. Selwyn, E. Smith, D. Wyse, and L.E. Suter (eds) The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational Research. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications, Limited, pp. 477–504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983953.n24.
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Dauber, D. (2019) ‘Internationalisation and student diversity: how far are the opportunity benefits being perceived and exploited?’, Higher education, 78(6), pp. 1035–1058. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00386-4.
Wang, J. et al. (2025) ‘The adjustment processes of international students at a UK university: an exploration using the L2 self-regulatory system’, Journal of multil
Competencies
This session addresses the following competencies of the UKAT Professional Framework for Advising and TutoringC3 - Academic advising and tutoring approaches and strategies
I1 - HE Provider mission, vision, values, and culture
R1 - Build advising and tutoring relationships through empathetic listening and compassion for students, and be accessible in ways that challenge, support, nurture, and teach