The cross-institutional project on student advising highlights a sector-wide shift in UK higher education, where advising is becoming central to student success rather than a peripheral support function, driven by regulatory pressures, financial constraints and evolving student expectations. Effective models increasingly emphasise proactive, data-informed outreach—intervening early based on engagement patterns—while recognising that data is only valuable when combined with clear institutional purpose, staff capacity and a coherent advising philosophy. The findings also stress the importance of clarity, consistency and defined baseline provision, particularly in complex or devolved institutions, alongside a growing expectation that advising must demonstrate measurable impact through ongoing evaluation. Despite this move towards systems, metrics and professionalisation, the project underscores that advising remains fundamentally relational, relying on trust, emotional engagement and meaningful staff–student interactions as the foundation for successful outcomes.
We welcome contributions on topics related to personal tutoring and academic advising.
Contributions should be submitted to blog@ukat.ac.uk
Spotlight on the Postgraduate students SIG
The UKAT Postgraduate Special Interest Group (SIG) exists to champion the cause of taught postgraduate (PGT) students and those advising them. We challenge the presumption that PGT tutoring and advising is the same as those for undergraduates. We currently have 69 members representing 31 Institutions from across the UK and would welcome others to join us.
Spolight on the Mental Health and Wellbeing SIG
The UKAT Mental Health and Wellbeing Special Interest Group (SIG) was created in 2024 to champion wellbeing for both students and staff in higher education. Academic advising is rewarding, but it can also be emotionally demanding. Our SIG exists to ensure that wellbeing is not an afterthought and is central to personal tutoring and advising practice and institutional culture. W ...
UKAT's Evaluation Special interest Group
UKAT’s Evaluation Special Interest Group. Overview AdvanceHE define evaluation as “the means by which a course or a curriculum change can be monitored to see if, in fact, it is what it claims to be and if it achieves, in students, the intended outcomes. For an evaluation to take place in any measured way, the purposes of a teaching innovation and the expected outcomes in terms ...
Reflections on Representing MMU at the UKAT Conference 2025
On Monday, April 7, I had the honour of attending the UKAT Annual Conference 2025, themed “Shaping the Future of Personal Tutoring and Academic Advising in Higher Education.” Representing Manchester Metropolitan University and the student voice at this national forum was both a privilege and a profound responsibility. Engaging in meaningful conversations about the evolving landscape of academic support, I was inspired by the collective commitment to fostering inclusive and supportive educational environments. The conference underscored the vital role of student perspectives in shaping policies and practices that directly impact our academic journeys. Being part of this dialogue reinforced my belief in the power of collaboration between students and educators to drive positive change in higher education.
The Importance of boundaries in personal tutoring and academic advising
UKAT recently delivered our first workshop on ‘Setting Boundaries in Personal Tutoring and Academic Advising’ using LEGO® Serious Play® (LSP) as the medium to communicate and discuss some tricky issues for staff at Harper Adams University. The workshop explored colleagues’ individual boundaries around their roles as senior tutors, course tutors and professional service staff who provide advice and guidance to students.
A theoretical and practical approach to enhancing students’ sense of belonging
In this blog, Prof. Louise Taylor at Oxford Brookes University, describes an activity that she developed, which is well suited to personal tutoring sessions. It is grounded in social-psychological theory and aims to increase students’ sense of belonging by strengthening their identity as a member of their discipline. The activity creates an essential space for students to learn about the impact of identities on their learning, reflect on their own identities, and engage in research-informed activities for strengthening their own discipline identities. By creating this space during personal tutoring sessions, students will be supported to enhance their university student identity, which will underpin improved academic outcomes.
Towards Inclusive Tutoring: Elevating Student Voices and Empowering Knowledge Co-Creation
As higher education (HE) strives for inclusivity and equity, rethinking the tutor-student dynamic is vital. Tutors, advisers, and support staff are central to creating a respectful, collaborative academic environment where students feel heard. David Ausubel aptly observed, “The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows.” This highlights the importance of valuing students’ prior knowledge in the advising interactions aimed at empowering students' educational development.
The Power of the Micro-Connection
In the hectic world of universities, we sometimes overlook or take for granted the human need for connection and the value of connections in shaping and moulding our experiences, relationships, and our wellbeing. Interactions with those around us can have a lasting impact, it can make your day, open lines of communication and create lasting bonds. For staff, connections can enhance our communities of practice which has been shown to be a powerful tool for professional development (MacPhail, 2014), reveal surprising links across institutions and encourage us to work in different ways. For students connections can create a sense of belonging, noted as critical to student retention (O'Keeffe, 2013), support wellbeing and make the learning experience more valuable and memorable.
Reimagining Personal Tutoring and Academic Advising to Narrow the Awarding Gap
In recent years, closing the awarding gap in higher education has become a primary focus for UK higher education institutions (HEIs). Arguably, the increasing scrutiny from the Office for Students (OfS) has prompted HEIs to confront the persistent attainment gap, particularly between White and Black students. While data reveals that Black students are less likely to achieve an upper-second or first-class degree, the OfS mandate aims to "eliminate the unexplained gap in non-continuation between the most and least represented groups of students by 2024-25 and eliminate the absolute gap by 2030-31" (OfS, 2022, p. 24). Accordingly, many HEIs are making asserted efforts to implement systemic and pedagogical reforms to reduce disparities in student outcomes.
A recent online panel discussion, hosted by United Kingdom Advising and Tutoring (UKAT), explored the urgent need to address the awarding gap. Chaired by Denise Miller, and attended by 154 participants, the panel discussion featured contributions from nationwide experts, including Eleanor St Hilaire, Claire Brown, and Josephine Gabi. The discussion focused on reimagining personal tutoring and academic advising to reduce the awarding gap.